¿Puedo vibecodear Consensus?
NO TANTO · sigue valiendo pagarloDo not mistake the interface for the product. Consensus's durable value is data, import reliability, which a solo one-shot build cannot reproduce responsibly. The prompt therefore builds only the closest honest personal consolation tool.
Build the closest honest consolation tool inspired by Consensus; do not claim to replace its structural moat. Use exactly this stack: Next.js 15 + TypeScript + SQLite + Playwright. Primary job: Build a private AI academic search workspace that imports user-supplied URLs or files, extracts metadata, supports notes, and searches the local corpus. Start from an empty folder and create the complete working project. Make the default mode single-user and private. Store user data locally unless the core job requires the declared self-hosted database. Do not add analytics, telemetry, ads, or third-party accounts. Put every secret and external credential in .env and provide .env.example. Use realistic sample data that is clearly labelled and easy to delete. Implement the smallest polished interface that completes the core loop end to end. Include clear empty, loading, validation, success, and failure states. Add import and export so the user is not trapped in the app. Use accessible keyboard navigation, labels, focus states, and sensible contrast. Validate untrusted input and never log secrets or private file contents. Deliberately exclude these paid-product advantages: publisher-specific import reliability; citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access. Do not fake integrations, network effects, proprietary data, model quality, compliance, or security claims. Where an external API is optional, keep the app useful without it and explain the degraded mode. Write focused unit tests for the data model and the most important workflow. Add one end-to-end smoke test that proves the core loop works. Create a README with setup, permissions, architecture, data location, backup, and limitations. Add scripts for install, development, test, build, and a production-style local run. Run the tests and build before finishing, then fix errors rather than merely describing them.
$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo · este prompt se genera del plan de build · mejorarlo con un PR
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
veredictos nuevos + votos de la semana. gratis. te sales en un clic.
Consensus: Researchers pay for correct metadata, resilient importers, citation coverage, and workflows that survive publisher and browser changes.
xpublisher-specific import reliability
xcitation graph scale
xteam libraries and institutional access
xlicensed scholarly metadata
¿No quieres construirlo? Esta gente ya lo hizo gratis.
sin votos, sin pago por aparecer · solo lo que es real
Precio de Consensus
| plan | mensual | anual (por mes) | qué incluye |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | $0/usuario | $0/usuario | Unlimited Papers searches; 15 Pro messages/month; 3 Deep Reviews/month; 10 Study Snapshots/month. |
| pro | $20/usuario | $12/usuario | Unlimited Papers searches and Pro messages; 15 Deep Reviews/month; unlimited Study Snapshots. |
| deep | $65/usuario | $45/usuario | 200 Deep Reviews/month. |
| teams | a medida | — | Up to 200 seats; 50 Deep Reviews/user/month. |
| enterprise | a medida | — | More than 200 seats; custom security, billing and usage. |
plan gratisunlimited Papers searches; 15 Pro messages/month; 3 Deep Reviews/month; 10 Study Snapshots/month
facturaciónmonthly + annual for Pro and Deep; Teams and Enterprise quote-based
costos ocultosstudent and faculty discounts are 40%; eligible clinicians receive 25%; team price scales by seat
verificado 2026-08-13 · fuente ↗
¿Puedo vibecodear Consensus?
No tanto. El valor de Consensus no es el código. Mira el desglose honesto arriba.
¿Cuánto cuesta Consensus?
El precio de Consensus va por uso o cambia según el plan · The official pricing URL is recorded, but a stable current amount was not safely recoverable in this pass. Do not publish a number until rechecked..
¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Consensus?
Con honestidad: publisher-specific import reliability; citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access; licensed scholarly metadata. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.
¿Hay una alternativa open source a Consensus?
Sí: Ai2 Asta (Ask a scientific question and get a cited mini-review instead of a confidence meter.) El prompt es para cuando la quieres exactamente a tu modo.