¿Puedo vibecodear Dux-Soup?

PARCIAL · un fin de semana
precio $14.99/mesahorrarías $179.88/añotiempo de build un fin de semanacategoría 📤 prospecciónreemplazada por 0 personas

Mechanically this is a Playwright script that drives your own logged-in Chrome profile, clicks buttons, and waits a random number of seconds. An agent can get a working profile-visitor and connection-request sender running in a session, and a small campaign queue with daily caps by the end of a weekend. What you are actually buying from Dux-Soup is the accumulated caution: throttle curves that do not get your account restricted, selectors that keep working after LinkedIn reshuffles the DOM every few weeks, and a cloud mode so your laptop does not have to stay awake. Note that neither the paid tool nor your script is blessed by LinkedIn, so the ban risk is yours in both cases; you are just choosing who tunes the pacing. Build it if you want ten touches a day and enjoy fixing selectors, buy it if outreach volume is how you eat.

el prompt
Build a local LinkedIn outreach assistant that drives my own browser. Stack: TypeScript, Node 20, Playwright with a persistent Chromium user data dir, better-sqlite3 for state, no server, no cloud, no telemetry, no account system. CLI only.

Structure:
- src/browser.ts: launches Playwright chromium with userDataDir from .env (PROFILE_DIR), headed by default so I can watch and take over.
- src/login.ts: opens linkedin.com and waits for me to log in manually, then exits. Never handle or store my password. No credentials in code or .env.
- src/db.ts: SQLite schema for targets (url, name, status, added_at) and actions (target_url, action_type, result, ran_at).
- src/import.ts: reads targets.csv (column: profile_url, optional first_name) and inserts new rows as status 'queued'.
- src/run.ts: the campaign loop.

Campaign loop rules:
- Read config from config.json: daily_visit_cap, daily_connect_cap, active_hours (start and end, local time), min_delay_seconds, max_delay_seconds.
- Default caps low and boring: 20 visits, 10 connects.
- Sleep a random interval between min and max delay between every action, plus a longer random pause every 5 actions.
- Stop immediately and log if the page shows a captcha, a checkpoint, an 'unusual activity' interstitial, or a login redirect. Do not retry.
- Actions: visit profile, and optionally click Connect and add a note rendered from templates/connect.txt with {{first_name}} substitution. Truncate notes to the field limit.
- Everything runs in dry-run mode unless --live is passed. Dry run logs the exact action it would take.
- Idempotent: never act twice on the same target for the same action type.

Also include: src/report.ts printing counts by status and action outcome, a README that states plainly that this automates a logged-in session and may violate LinkedIn's user agreement and can get an account restricted, and a .env.example with PROFILE_DIR only.

Out of scope: scraping or guessing email addresses, bulk profile data export, running headless to evade detection, proxy rotation, multiple accounts, reply detection, CRM sync, any hosted component.

$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo

Se puede en parte

Ahorro de referencia: US$180/año si dejas de pagar Dux-Soup.

Quiero que lo armen →
por qué la gente sigue pagando

Because the failure modes are expensive and asymmetric. A sloppy script gets your LinkedIn account rate-limited or restricted, and for people doing outbound sales that account is the pipeline. Paying a few tens of dollars a month for someone whose full-time job is keeping the clicks looking human, plus a cloud runner and CRM handoff, is cheaper than a week of debugging selectors and one restricted profile. The DIY build is real and fun for low volume; it is a bad trade at volume.

qué pierdes

xPacing heuristics and safety limits tuned across a lot of accounts, not guessed at by you

xSelector maintenance: when LinkedIn changes markup, someone else patches their extension and nobody patches yours

xCloud execution, so campaigns keep running with your laptop shut

xWebhook and CRM plumbing into HubSpot, Pipedrive and friends, plus Zapier glue

xCampaign reporting, reply detection and sequence branching that actually stops when someone answers

arte previo · úsalo en vez de construir, si prefieres

Nada que valga la pena señalar. Por eso existe el prompt.

compartir en X ↗"Acabo de reemplazar Dux-Soup ($14.99/mes) con un prompt"
preguntas
¿Puedo vibecodear Dux-Soup?

Parcial. El núcleo de Dux-Soup se arma en un fin de semana con el prompt de esta página, pero hay huecos reales: Pacing heuristics and safety limits tuned across a lot of accounts, not guessed at by you, Selector maintenance: when LinkedIn changes markup, someone else patches their extension and nobody patches yours. Lee la lista honesta arriba antes de comprometerte.

¿Cuánto cuesta Dux-Soup?

Dux-Soup cuesta unos $14.99/mes (Pro Dux, revisado 2026-08-18), o sea $179.88 al año.

¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Dux-Soup?

Con honestidad: Pacing heuristics and safety limits tuned across a lot of accounts, not guessed at by you; Selector maintenance: when LinkedIn changes markup, someone else patches their extension and nobody patches yours; Cloud execution, so campaigns keep running with your laptop shut; Webhook and CRM plumbing into HubSpot, Pipedrive and friends, plus Zapier glue; Campaign reporting, reply detection and sequence branching that actually stops when someone answers. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.

¿Hay una alternativa open source a Dux-Soup?

No hay una alternativa open source madura que valga señalar. Por eso existe el prompt de esta página.

Cada semana mueren más suscripciones.

Veredictos nuevos, prompts nuevos, las apps más condenadas de la semana.
Un correo. Te sales en un clic.

gratis para siempre · sin spam · el prompt se queda en el sitio, las muertes te llegan a ti

$semanal: qué recibió veredicto, qué murió.