¿Puedo vibecodear Maze?
NO TANTO · sigue valiendo pagarloA consolation build is possible, but the paid product's decisive value sits outside a solo rebuild. For Maze, run small unmoderated prototype tasks with consent and basic completion analytics. The hard boundary is participant panel, prototype integrations, testing infrastructure, analytics, and recruitment, plus participant network, synthesis workflow, and collaboration.
Build a closest honest personal substitute for Maze in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Resend; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: run small unmoderated prototype tasks with consent, collect structured feedback with basic completion analytics, merge duplicates, connect evidence to themes, and publish a transparent research view. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Create public and private feedback intake with consent text and optional contact details. Support posts, votes, comments, tags, statuses, owners, and duplicate merging. Add a research note type with evidence links, quotes, themes, and confidence. Build search and filters across feedback, customers, segments, themes, and status. Provide email notifications, moderation, export, deletion, and an audit log. Publish a read-only roadmap or findings page using only explicitly public items. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out a paid research-participant marketplace. Deliberately leave out unlimited video storage and automated transcription. Deliberately leave out enterprise repositories, SSO, and governance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used.
$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo · este prompt se genera del plan de build · mejorarlo con un PR
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
veredictos nuevos + votos de la semana. gratis. te sales en un clic.
People still pay for Maze because people pay either for access to participants or for a research repository that keeps evidence usable across an organization. The recurring cost buys recruitment, consent, scheduling, media storage, transcription, tagging consistency, notifications, search, and retention, not just the visible interface.
xparticipant panel, prototype integrations, testing infrastructure, analytics, and recruitment
xlarge participant panel
xrecording and transcription infrastructure
xadvanced research repository
xenterprise governance
¿No quieres construirlo? Esta gente ya lo hizo gratis.
UXtweak FreeOne small unmoderated prototype study at a time; results vanish from the dashboard after two weeks.free↗sin votos, sin pago por aparecer · solo lo que es real
¿Puedo vibecodear Maze?
No tanto. El valor de Maze no es el código. Mira el desglose honesto arriba.
¿Cuánto cuesta Maze?
Maze cuesta unos $99/mes (Starter, revisado 2026-07-31), o sea $1188 al año.
¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Maze?
Con honestidad: participant panel, prototype integrations, testing infrastructure, analytics, and recruitment; large participant panel; recording and transcription infrastructure; advanced research repository; enterprise governance. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.
¿Hay una alternativa open source a Maze?
Sí: UXtweak Free (One small unmoderated prototype study at a time; results vanish from the dashboard after two weeks.) El prompt es para cuando la quieres exactamente a tu modo.