¿Puedo vibecodear OpenPTE?

PARCIAL · un fin de semana
precio $17.99/mesahorrarías $215.88/añotiempo de build un fin de semanacategoría 🎓 educaciónreemplazada por 0 personas

The mechanics of a PTE trainer are not hard: record audio, transcribe it, time the task, score against a rubric, keep a history. An agent can build that in a weekend using Whisper for transcription and an LLM for rubric feedback, and you will genuinely practice more because the loop is yours. What you cannot build is the part people actually pay for: a question bank that tracks what is currently showing up in the real exam, and a scoring model calibrated against Pearson's automated marker so the number you see means something. Your DIY grader will be directionally useful and numerically fictional. Good enough for drilling fluency and essay structure, not good enough to decide whether you are ready to book the test.

el prompt
Build a local PTE Academic practice trainer. Empty folder, no accounts, no telemetry, no cloud database.

Stack, non negotiable: Next.js 15 with the App Router, TypeScript, Tailwind, and SQLite via better-sqlite3. Everything runs with `npm run dev` on localhost. Secrets in .env.local only, read `OPENAI_API_KEY` and `OPENAI_BASE_URL`.

Data: a `questions/` folder of JSON files, one per task type, each item having id, type, prompt text, optional imagePath, optional audioPath, timeLimitSeconds, and preparationSeconds. Ship 3 dummy items per type so the app runs before the user adds real content. Do not scrape or invent exam content.

Task types to support: Read Aloud, Repeat Sentence, Describe Image, Retell Lecture (speaking, recorded), plus Summarize Written Text, Write Essay (typed), and Reading Fill in the Blanks (drag or select).

Practice flow: pick a task type, get a random unattempted item, show preparation countdown, then the recording or typing window with a hard timer that auto-submits. Use MediaRecorder for audio, store the webm blob under `data/recordings/`.

Scoring: for speaking, send audio to the Whisper transcription endpoint, then compute words per minute, filled pause count, and for Read Aloud a word level diff against the reference text. For writing, compute word count and run a rubric prompt. In both cases call the chat model with a task specific rubric that returns strict JSON: content, form, fluency, pronunciation or grammar, each 0 to 5, plus two sentences of feedback and three concrete fixes. Store the raw JSON.

Label every score in the UI as "unofficial, uncalibrated" and never render a 10 to 90 style score. This is deliberate.

History: an attempts table plus a dashboard with a per task type trend line, a list of past attempts with playback of the stored audio, and a CSV export.

Out of scope: full mock tests, official score mapping, user accounts, payments, mobile apps, sync, and any bundled question bank.

Deliver a README covering setup, how to add your own items to `questions/`, and a blunt paragraph on why these scores are not predictions.

$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo

Se puede en parte

Ahorro de referencia: US$216/año si dejas de pagar OpenPTE.

Quiero que lo armen →
por qué la gente sigue pagando

Because a test taker is not buying software, they are buying a number they can trust before they pay the exam fee. A prep platform's value is the item bank that mirrors what is currently in circulation and a grader tuned so a 79 on the practice test means roughly a 79 on the day. Both of those are accumulated data work, not code. A self-built trainer is great for volume practice and terrible for readiness signals, which is exactly the wrong half to have if you only get one shot at the visa cutoff.

qué pierdes

xScores calibrated to the real automated marker, so your numbers are vibes, not predictions

xA question bank that is maintained and rotated as the exam changes

xFull mock tests with official section timing, weighting and score report layout

xModel answers, templates and community discussion around each item

xMobile apps, cross-device sync, and anyone to blame when the grader is wrong

arte previo · úsalo en vez de construir, si prefieres

Nada que valga la pena señalar. Por eso existe el prompt.

compartir en X ↗"Acabo de reemplazar OpenPTE ($17.99/mes) con un prompt"
preguntas
¿Puedo vibecodear OpenPTE?

Parcial. El núcleo de OpenPTE se arma en un fin de semana con el prompt de esta página, pero hay huecos reales: Scores calibrated to the real automated marker, so your numbers are vibes, not predictions, A question bank that is maintained and rotated as the exam changes. Lee la lista honesta arriba antes de comprometerte.

¿Cuánto cuesta OpenPTE?

OpenPTE cuesta unos $17.99/mes (Premium 30-day pass, revisado 2026-08-18), o sea $215.88 al año.

¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo OpenPTE?

Con honestidad: Scores calibrated to the real automated marker, so your numbers are vibes, not predictions; A question bank that is maintained and rotated as the exam changes; Full mock tests with official section timing, weighting and score report layout; Model answers, templates and community discussion around each item; Mobile apps, cross-device sync, and anyone to blame when the grader is wrong. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.

¿Hay una alternativa open source a OpenPTE?

No hay una alternativa open source madura que valga señalar. Por eso existe el prompt de esta página.

Cada semana mueren más suscripciones.

Veredictos nuevos, prompts nuevos, las apps más condenadas de la semana.
Un correo. Te sales en un clic.

gratis para siempre · sin spam · el prompt se queda en el sitio, las muertes te llegan a ti

$semanal: qué recibió veredicto, qué murió.