Un proyecto de Mauricio Gallmur· el prompt es gratis · si quieres que un agente lo corra solo, eso es lo que instalo

¿Puedo vibecodear Profound?

PARCIAL · un fin de semana
precio $99/mesahorrarías $1,188/añotiempo de build varios díascategoría 📈 seo y marketingreemplazada por 0 personas

The tracking loop is genuinely weekend-buildable: send a fixed prompt set through four model APIs on a schedule, count brand and competitor mentions, normalize the citations, and parse your access logs for AI crawler and AI referral traffic. That gets you most of the dashboard for one brand. The gaps are the honest part. API answers are not the answers the ChatGPT app or Google AI Overviews actually serve, you cannot measure what real people ask AI, and a number with no history behind it tells you nothing on week one.

el prompt
Build me a local AI answer engine visibility tracker for one brand. Requirements:

- Node 22, TypeScript, SQLite via better-sqlite3, a CLI, and a plain server-rendered
  dashboard. Local only, no accounts, no telemetry.
- brand.json holds my brand name, aliases, domain, and competitor names. prompts.json
  holds up to 40 buyer questions.
- `track run` sends every prompt through OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Perplexity with
  each provider's web search or grounding tool enabled. Keys live in .env.
- Store one immutable row per run, prompt, and provider: raw answer, cited URLs, model
  id, latency, and error text. Never overwrite an existing run.
- Cap concurrency at 3 per provider, retry twice on 429 and 5xx with backoff, and keep
  failed cells visible in the report instead of dropping them.
- Detect brand and competitor mentions case-insensitively using the alias list, and
  record the first-mention character offset as a crude prominence proxy.
- Score the sentiment of each brand mention in one cheap structured pass over stored
  answers, after the run, never inline.
- Normalize citations to hostname plus canonical path, strip tracking parameters, then
  compute owned-domain citation share and a top 25 sources table.
- `track serve` renders visibility per provider over time, share of voice against each
  competitor, the sources table, and the prompts where competitors appear and I do not.
- `track crawlers --log access.log` parses server logs for GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot,
  ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended and friends, plus referral hits from
  chatgpt.com and perplexity.ai, and reports which URLs they touched.
- Keep the bot user agent list in an editable JSON file. Log lines matching nothing get
  counted as unknown agents, not silently discarded.
- `track export` writes runs, mentions, and citations to CSV.
- Fixture tests for mention detection, URL normalization, and log parsing.
- Out of scope: real consumer surface answers, prompt volume estimates, content
  generation agents, teams, and hosted scheduling. Do not scrape the consumer web UIs.
- README: setup, per-run cost estimate, a cron line for daily runs, and a plain note
  that API answers only approximate what users actually see.

$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo

por qué la gente sigue pagando

Because the tracking is the cheap half. Profound sells the two things a personal script cannot produce: prompt volume data drawn from real conversations, so you know which questions are worth ranking for at all, and a maintained panel across nine answer engines including the consumer surfaces with no usable API. Marketing teams also want a number somebody else vouches for before it goes in a board deck.

qué pierdes

xprompt volume data: what people actually ask AI is not measurable from outside

xthe real consumer surfaces, since AI Overviews and the ChatGPT app have no API that matches what users see

xmonths of history and competitor baselines, without which a single week's visibility number means nothing

xupkeep as engines, crawler user agents, and citation formats keep changing

xthe agent, recommendation, and product visibility layers stacked on top of the tracking

compartir en X ↗"Acabo de reemplazar Profound ($99/mes) con un prompt"
la salida

¿No quieres construirlo? Esta gente ya lo hizo gratis.

ElmoA real self-hosted AI visibility dashboard; crawler-log analysis is the conspicuous thing it does not replace.224aug 2026open source

sin votos, sin pago por aparecer · solo lo que es real

los números

Precio de Profound

planmensualanual (por mes)qué incluye
starter$99/workspace1 seat; 50 prompts; 1,500 AI responses/month; daily refresh; 1 language/region; 100 agent credits; unlimited domains.
growth$399/workspace3 seats; 100 prompts; 9,000 AI responses/month; daily refresh; 1 language/region; 400 agent credits; exports.
enterprisea medidaCustom seats, prompts, response volume, languages/regions, data access, security, and support.

plan gratisno free tier; a trial link is offered, but public duration and numeric caps were not verified

facturaciónmonthly only on the public pricing page; no public annual rate

costos ocultosAgent usage can continue past included credits or be paused, but public per-credit overage pricing is not disclosed.

verificado 2026-08-14 · fuente ↗

preguntas
¿Puedo vibecodear Profound?

Parcial. El núcleo de Profound se arma en un fin de semana con el prompt de esta página, pero hay huecos reales: prompt volume data: what people actually ask AI is not measurable from outside, the real consumer surfaces, since AI Overviews and the ChatGPT app have no API that matches what users see. Lee la lista honesta arriba antes de comprometerte.

¿Cuánto cuesta Profound?

Profound cuesta unos $99/mes (Starter, revisado 2026-08-04), o sea $1188 al año.

¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Profound?

Con honestidad: prompt volume data: what people actually ask AI is not measurable from outside; the real consumer surfaces, since AI Overviews and the ChatGPT app have no API that matches what users see; months of history and competitor baselines, without which a single week's visibility number means nothing; upkeep as engines, crawler user agents, and citation formats keep changing; the agent, recommendation, and product visibility layers stacked on top of the tracking. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.

¿Hay una alternativa open source a Profound?

Sí: Elmo (A real self-hosted AI visibility dashboard; crawler-log analysis is the conspicuous thing it does not replace.) El prompt es para cuando la quieres exactamente a tu modo.

Cada semana mueren más suscripciones.

Veredictos nuevos, prompts nuevos, las apps más condenadas de la semana.
Un correo. Te sales en un clic.

gratis para siempre · sin spam · el prompt se queda en el sitio, las muertes te llegan a ti

$semanal: qué recibió veredicto, qué murió.