¿Puedo vibecodear Scite?
NO TANTO · sigue valiendo pagarloThe AI classification of a citation as supporting, contrasting or mentioning is a solvable NLP task, but the product's real value is the licensed full-text corpus across 40+ publishers plus preprint servers, kept current and cross-referenced at scale. No individual or small team can replicate that data-access moat; a DIY build only works on open-access papers, which is a small fraction of the literature that matters for a lot of fields.
Build me an open-access citation-context checker as a Next.js app. Stack: Next.js + TypeScript, SQLite via better-sqlite3, Tailwind. No auth, single user, localhost only. Core loop: 1. A search box where I paste a DOI or arXiv ID; fetch its metadata and reference list via the free Semantic Scholar API (no key needed). 2. For each citing paper available as open-access full text (via arXiv or PubMed Central APIs), pull the sentence(s) around the citation. 3. Send each citation sentence to the Anthropic API (key from .env) with a fixed prompt asking it to classify the citation as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning, with a one-line reason. 4. Show results in a table: citing paper, classification, and the quoted sentence, filterable by classification. Out of scope: paywalled-publisher content, browser extension, manuscript reference-check upload, accounts, alerts. Include a README noting this only works for open-access papers and citing papers, unlike a licensed full-text database.
$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
veredictos nuevos + votos de la semana. gratis. te sales en un clic.
Researchers pay for reliable, broad coverage of paywalled literature and for a maintained, cross-checked citation graph rather than re-scraping and re-classifying papers themselves every time.
xcoverage of paywalled publishers (Wiley, Cambridge, Wolters Kluwer, etc.)
xpre-built citation database spanning hundreds of millions of citation statements
xretraction/correction flags sourced from Crossref and PubMed
xbrowser extension overlay on Google Scholar and journal pages
xreference-check tool for uploaded manuscripts
¿No quieres construirlo? Esta gente ya lo hizo gratis.
Semantic ScholarFree academic search engine with citation graphs and TLDR summaries, though without support/contrast classification.free↗
COREFree aggregator of over 200 million open-access research papers with full-text search.free↗sin votos, sin pago por aparecer · solo lo que es real
Precio de Scite
premium$20/mes · monthly · $240/año
plan gratisFree account allows searching the citation database plus one report and one visualization per month, but reports can't be exported.
verificado 2026-08-10 · fuente ↗
¿Scite es gratis?
Free account allows searching the citation database plus one report and one visualization per month, but reports can't be exported. El plan de pago es Premium a $20/mes (revisado 2026-08-10).
¿Puedo vibecodear Scite?
No tanto. El valor de Scite no es el código. Mira el desglose honesto arriba.
¿Cuánto cuesta Scite?
Scite cuesta unos $20/mes (Premium, revisado 2026-08-10), o sea $240 al año.
¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Scite?
Con honestidad: coverage of paywalled publishers (Wiley, Cambridge, Wolters Kluwer, etc.); pre-built citation database spanning hundreds of millions of citation statements; retraction/correction flags sourced from Crossref and PubMed; browser extension overlay on Google Scholar and journal pages; reference-check tool for uploaded manuscripts. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.
¿Hay una alternativa open source a Scite?
Sí: Semantic Scholar (Free academic search engine with citation graphs and TLDR summaries, though without support/contrast classification.) CORE (Free aggregator of over 200 million open-access research papers with full-text search.) El prompt es para cuando la quieres exactamente a tu modo.