¿Puedo vibecodear Rankwise?
PARCIAL · un fin de semanaThe measurement half is a weekend project. Fire a fixed question set at the ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity APIs on a schedule, count whether your domain gets named, store every run, and you have the dashboard. What takes Rankwise past that is the acting half: ranking topics by demand and citation gap, drafting sourced articles, and publishing them into WordPress, Shopify, Webflow or Wix without breaking anything. You can hand-write that loop for one site and one CMS. Doing it across four engines and four CMSes, every week, while the APIs move under you, is the part that stays a product.
Build me a local AI answer engine citation tracker for one website. Requirements: - Node 22, TypeScript, SQLite via better-sqlite3, a CLI plus a server-rendered dashboard on localhost. No accounts, no telemetry, everything stays on my machine except the API calls. - site.json holds my domain, brand aliases and competitor domains. questions.json holds up to 40 buyer questions I want to be the answer to. - `rank run` sends every question through OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and Perplexity with each provider's web search or grounding tool on. Keys live in .env. - Write one immutable row per run, question and provider: raw answer, cited URLs, model id and any error. Never overwrite a previous run, history is the whole point. - Cap concurrency at 3 per provider, retry twice on 429 and 5xx with backoff, and show failed cells in the report rather than dropping them silently. - Normalize every citation to hostname plus canonical path, strip tracking params, then compute my citation share and a top 25 cited domains table per engine. - `rank serve` renders citation rate per engine over time, the questions where a competitor is cited and I am not, and a week-over-week diff. - `rank audit <url>` fetches one page and reports the mechanical gaps only: missing or invalid JSON-LD, missing canonical, robots and llms.txt rules blocking AI crawlers, and thin heading structure. Print the JSON-LD block it would add. - `rank export` writes runs and citations to CSV. - Out of scope: writing articles, publishing to a CMS, and scraping the consumer chat UIs. Use the APIs only. - README: setup, per-run cost estimate, a cron line for the weekly run, and a plain note that API answers only approximate what users are actually shown.
$ ábrelo en tu agente (prompt listo, tú das enter) o cópialo crudo
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
veredictos nuevos + votos de la semana. gratis. te sales en un clic.
Because measuring the gap is the easy half and closing it is the work. A personal script tells you Perplexity never mentions you. It does not decide which of forty questions is winnable, write a sourced article, get it live in your CMS, and then prove which citation that article won. The accumulated score history matters too: the number is meaningless in week one and load-bearing in month six, and starting over resets you to zero.
xthe CMS publishing matrix, and the upkeep as WordPress, Shopify, Webflow and Wix each change their APIs
xthe editorial layer: topics ranked by demand, citation gap and winnability, then drafted and reviewed rather than dumped
xexact technical diffs (JSON-LD, canonicals, robots rules, llms.txt) instead of generic advice you still have to translate
xmonths of score history, without which a single week's citation rate tells you nothing
xper-engine weekly scoring across seven on-page dimensions, which costs real API spend every run
¿No quieres construirlo? Esta gente ya lo hizo gratis.
ElmoTracks the citations honestly. Writing the article and pushing it to your CMS is still your evening.open source↗sin votos, sin pago por aparecer · solo lo que es real
Precio de Rankwise
starter$59/mes · monthly · $708/año
plan gratisAfter the trial the account drops to a free plan that keeps monitoring 1 domain and 10 tracked questions against Perplexity, re-checked weekly, with the score history intact. Writing and publishing articles need a paid plan.
verificado 2026-08-10 · fuente ↗
¿Rankwise es gratis?
After the trial the account drops to a free plan that keeps monitoring 1 domain and 10 tracked questions against Perplexity, re-checked weekly, with the score history intact. Writing and publishing articles need a paid plan. El plan de pago es Starter a $59/mes (revisado 2026-08-10).
¿Puedo vibecodear Rankwise?
Parcial. El núcleo de Rankwise se arma en un fin de semana con el prompt de esta página, pero hay huecos reales: the CMS publishing matrix, and the upkeep as WordPress, Shopify, Webflow and Wix each change their APIs, the editorial layer: topics ranked by demand, citation gap and winnability, then drafted and reviewed rather than dumped. Lee la lista honesta arriba antes de comprometerte.
¿Cuánto cuesta Rankwise?
Rankwise cuesta unos $59/mes (Starter, revisado 2026-08-10), o sea $708 al año.
¿Qué pierdo si reemplazo Rankwise?
Con honestidad: the CMS publishing matrix, and the upkeep as WordPress, Shopify, Webflow and Wix each change their APIs; the editorial layer: topics ranked by demand, citation gap and winnability, then drafted and reviewed rather than dumped; exact technical diffs (JSON-LD, canonicals, robots rules, llms.txt) instead of generic advice you still have to translate; months of score history, without which a single week's citation rate tells you nothing; per-engine weekly scoring across seven on-page dimensions, which costs real API spend every run. Si alguno de esos te sostiene el negocio, sigue pagando.
¿Hay una alternativa open source a Rankwise?
Sí: Elmo (Tracks the citations honestly. Writing the article and pushing it to your CMS is still your evening.) El prompt es para cuando la quieres exactamente a tu modo.